Archive for February, 2010
Aristotle Rockefeller Hughes, a multi-billionaire, failed to punctuate his will properly. Assume that you are one of the interested parties in this case – Mort, Sam, George, Louise or the judge – and punctuate the will so you will get everything:
I Aristotle Rockefeller Hughes being of sound mind do hereby declare this my last will and testament as delivered this day October 19 2002 to my lawyer Mort Mert who will get every cent of all my billions I leave everything to one individual to my brother-in-law Sam who has lived for years off my refrigerator and out of my wallet nothing to my partner George who boggled everything he did nothing to my sister Louise who turned him in to the judge all I own is hereby bequeathed upon my death.
Aristotle Rockefeller Hughes
Lupe Siniscalchi
why is that? is Hell an invention was taken from Greek paganism? did jesus say about hell? or heaven? any description? because he said King of Heavens.. God and his kingdom of heavens.. I can think in many heavens.. like judaism says there are 7 heavens and God lives in the last one..
Moon Wassenaar
I’m hosting a murder mystery that I wrote myself. The game begins with all the guests assembling for the reading of a deceased man’s last will and testament. However, I don’t know how to present this. Should I just have someone read the will outline? I don’t want to ask any of my guests to do so, since they’ll be “playing” but I don’t think it would be a good idea for me to do so because I’m female and it wouldn’t sound as dramatic. What should I do?
Lemuel Sangha
I want to create a murder mystery party for my little sister’s birthday party. It could be a sleepover…but I want it to be similar to the Westing Game.
The invites will read:
You are invited to hear the reading of the last will and testament of [I haven't created a name yet].
Any idea?
If you need more information just say so.
Jacinto Living
I was just wondering?
And also, I was wondering how much of this is true?: I heard that some Jews will attack Christians saying that they only follow some commandments from the law but not others (example eating pork). Then they’ll use Deuteronomy 4:2 and 12:32 where it says not to add to or take away from the word. Then if a Christian says, “But Jesus fulfilled the law, not going against it”, some Jews will say, “That’s not Biblical. Show me where in the Old Testament it says that the Messiah will do that to the Law? Show me? Where? Not biblical. And where does it say that Jesus is the prophesied Messiah? Show me where in the Old Testament it says Jesus? I believe in keeping to the Words from God. It says specifically not to add to or take away from.” I also heard some will say that at the end of Revelations it also says not to add to or take away, while most Biblical Scholars say that the Book of Revelations was not the last book of the New Testament written, but rather half way through, which would contradict all the rest of the N.T. that was written after that.
So how much of that is actually used as an argument? And what was the doctrinal purpose of Deuteronomy?
Mervin Quillian
It seems to me he used to do it a fair bit back in the Old Testament days, but strangely now that we have better technological means by which to record and verify miracles, they don’t happen. Just out of curiosity, does anyone know when it last did?
Any name for God you like, by the way.
I wasn’t referring to the Jews, any flavour of God you like – Allah, God, Yahweh, whatever and any race of “chosen people”, assuming that everyone who believes in God assumes themselves to be one of his chosen people.
Scott Cedars























